Will Kodachrome live again ?

Much has been said lately of Kodak’s  demise.   So I was intrigued by this ! http://www.cinematography.com/index.php?showtopic=55564

Apparently,  a restructuring of their company plus new technology could enable short runs of our favourite Kodak emulsions to order.  And even manufacturing Kodachrome is not impossible.  But wouldn’t  that have to mean reintroducing the processing chemicals ?

2 Responses to Will Kodachrome live again ?

  1. Hi Doug, thanks for this link,very intresting all round.I just finished re-building 3 EX5000 xenon 16mm projectors and will be selling one of them to rase money for the trust.Keep in tuch and I hope to win the film best regards allen

  2. Allen above is talking about the Projected Picture Trust of which he is a member. He showed me their website which is highly interesting. It’s
    http://wordpress.ppttrust.org/

    The aim of the trust is “To locate, preserve, renovate and exhibit the equipment and data, past and present, of still and moving images”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Ultra 16 Projector…. at the finish

Well,  I finally got round to finishing the Ultra-16  Bolex projector.  It hasn’t  really taken that much time,  it’s just that other work has got in the way a bit.

You may recall from a previous post that I had widened the gate to show the full U16  image as produced by the Bolex U16  camera.   Now I turned my attention to the 3  sprockets and  3 rollers,  see above.  The sprockets on this projector are  wider than those on a camera,  to ensure that mis-aligned made splices pass easily.  You can see that on the unmodified standard 16mm sprocket there are two machined  support rings on the sound-track side.  The innermost ring is a possible scratch risk for U16,  so needs to be removed.  Doing this  though,  will mean that the film is not very well supported at that side.  So,  having carefully dismantled the sprocket,  I added another support ring right next to the outermost ring.  For this I used fuse wire which was Araldited on,  and carefully reduced to the correct diameter.  I then removed the inner ring.   The film is supported also by the sprocket-tooth ring  at the other side.  The sprocket teeth are narrow and therefore just outside the U16 image width,  so it was not necessary to remove any metal between them,  lucky…  as this steel is incredibly hard !    As for the polished guides that hold the film on the sprocket,  it was unnecessary to modify them.  The innermost guide is the only one that might have posed a problem for U16,  but is slightly recessed and happily does not actually touch the film in normal circumstances.   After doing these  jobs,  I carefully aligned the components of the sprocket and reassembled it on the projector,  a tight fit on the spindle.   If it doesn’t  slide on  don’t force it,  it probably needs dismantling slightly,  screwing together and realigning.   And of course it must be exactly in line with the guides.

If there is any doubt left in your mind that you are tinkering with a precision instrument,  look no further than the rollers.  Where most manufacturers would have been content providing  cheap and cheerful lumps of plastic on a rod,  Bolex have given us precision-made  metal rollers, each with two snug ball-races !   The rollers are easy to remove.  One of them is a bit smaller and needs the control knob cover unscrewing first.  I extended the concave shape of the rollers so that no metal touches the U16 image.  All the rollers and sprockets,  apart from the tooth ring,  are made of alloy and easy to work.   I lubricated where necessary before reassembly.

I found some unused negative film and thoroughly tested the projector for scratching.  Happy with this,  I ran my first Ultra-16  film.   The result on the screen I can only describe as beautiful.  The lighting is uniform and sharpness excellent across the extra width.  The Bolex Hi-fi lens really shows what it can do.  I am really a fan now of Ultra-16 !  There is quite a difference I think between the 16:9  and  1.85:1 ratios.  I think if a film is made for widescreen,  it should be 1.85:1  or wider.  There is something about the impact that is missing with 16:9.

Summing up this U16  projector conversion….  It seems to have taken a lot longer than the camera mod did.   More work on sprockets etc.  Whereas I am happy with the kindness to the film,  I am aware that the enemy of  film projectors is Dust,  and it is possible that the gate could be vulnerable.  I will keep a constant watch on this.   All 16mm projectors have their minus and plus points for modifying to different formats.  It’s possible that another make is equally suitable for U16,  and I’d be interested to hear from anyone who’s  done a mod.

 

3 Responses to Ultra 16 Projector…. at the finish

  1. Excellent work, Douglas! Your efforts are to be congratulated. Please dessiminate your work on various forums. A small video would be wonderful. Thanks again for investing your time and efforts towards advancing the film engineering cause!

  2. Thanks Nicholas. I’ll think of that. Your UltraPan8 efforts are to be congratulated as well ! Long live ‘crazy’ film engineers. And hope any Bolex designers who are no longer with us, haven’t turned in their graves yet.

  3. Great work! would love to see any footage you shoot with your rig. I wish there was a way to use the projector to trigger an audio player. Like a sync tone, but causing the reel to reel to play the accompanying audio to your picture.
    = Badass audio, to your badass picture.

    Keep up the great site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Film by Tacita Dean

Escaping from running a shop and filing out projector gates,  I happened to visit the Tate Modern recently.

Tacita Dean’s  “Film”  is extraordinary.  I won’t try to describe it in detail,  but imagine the huge Turbine Hall  (filled last year with Weiwei’s  sunflower seeds),  pitch darkness,  and a 42 foot strip of 35mm film at one end,  fleeting images ever changing.

Tacita describes it as a visual poem, celebrating analogue film-making.     I think it is shown anamorphically,  presumably as a composite print with sprocket holes included.  The film was made using traditional hands-on  methods,  and apparently the artist was not absolutely sure how it would turn out.  I think many of us in analogue know that strangely exhilarating feeling.  Do see ”Film”  if you are in London.

I took this photo  ironically with a digital Canon compact.  Two kids were having a whale of a time jumping around at the foot of the work.  In later life I wonder how,  if,  they will remember our dear sprocketed film.

May I take this opportunity of wishing everyone a Happy 2012 !  Great pictures too.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

An Ultra-16 Projector

First I examined several projectors to see which would be easiest to convert to Ultra-16.  I wanted a nice simple film path that would avoid the unnecessary sound drum.  I suppose one could  add a half-width stripe to U16,  but for my purposes I just need a machine that shows the format mute,  and  is kind to the image.   And it goes without saying that picture steadiness must be good.

I finally decided on a Bolex S311.  First I tested it thoroughly with pristine film to make sure there was no wear on the perforations.  I was pleased with the smooth sound of the transport,  sweeter in fact than my S321.   Now,  it must be said that the gates of Bolex projectors have to be set up perfectly.   Otherwise, in my experience,  transport problems can occur.   I didn’t  want to disrupt what the Bolex engineer  had achieved long ago,  so my first act was to mark the precise surroundings of the gate assembly with a scriber.

I now removed all the bolts around the gate assembly and laid it all down on a clear surface with plenty of daylight.  Next I dismantled the front pressure pad and carefully put aside the springs etc.  I knocked up a stand out of wood that could be clamped down,  and attached the rear gate plate with screws.  By examining a piece of Ultra-16  test film in the channel I was able to ascertain just how much metal had to be removed either side of the rear aperture.   Now with the aid of a magnifier I carefully filed it away.  I also removed some of the sides top and bottom to make a nice smooth channel for the film to pass.   If you do this I recommend taking frequent breaks as you don’t want to let that file slip and score somewhere else in the channel.  Afterwards I used very fine emery paper to smooth off the edges.

Next I turned my attention to the front gate pad.  Again I screwed it carefully to the wooden stand.   As it shows the actual area of the desired image great care must be taken to get the dimensions right.  

It was a bit tricky positioning the U16 film sample  to check my progress.  Eventually,  I was happy with the filing either side.  For my purposes I wanted the whole U16 image to appear on the screen,  so I did not provide a safety margin as projector gates normally have.  After  making sure the edges were smooth,  I  filed out two thin pieces of metal to form the top and bottom of the gate.  To the front side (facing the projection lens)  I very carefully Araldited on one of the pieces,  again checking it with the U16 film sample.   The other piece is held in place by a small length of wire that I glued on.   So it is able to be slid out and removed.  I did this because I intend to use the projector to assist in making cutting copies with a synched 16mm camera…  I can mark the film outside the U16 area for later conforming.   But this mask-removal option is not needed for normal U16 projection.  Lastly I painted the surfaces around the gate matt black.

All the above took me quite a long time.   I was not even sure  that the end result would be satisfactory.  And spending a day of one’s  life ruining a Bolex projector isn’t  a nice thought.  Mainly I was concerned if I had removed too much metal for the film to be held flat and firm in the gate,  and  whether scratching might occur near the edges of the image.   So it was with some trepidation  that I screwed the gate assembly together and replaced it on the projector  carefully in the marked position,  finally adjusting the hinge that carries the framing knob.    I threaded some film  and switched on.    All appears well !

But the conversion is only part done.  I must now turn my attention to the sprockets and rollers.  Anything that touches the U16 image must be removed.  I’ll let you know the result next time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Is Ultra-16 the Answer ?

Last time we looked at Ian Smith’s  VariScope widescreen format.   Now imagine VariScope  ‘A’  with the sides chopped off,  reducing the ratio to  1.85 : 1 ….exactly the same shape as 35mm widescreen in fact.   This is ULTRA-16.

Ultra-16,  like VariScope ‘A’ ,  retains  the  image top and bottom that was Standard or Regular 16mm but doesn’t  use these  bits.  At any time,  if you  so  wish,   it’s possible to simply go back to filming in normal 4 x 3  16mm.   Unlike Super-16,  the lens position does not alter.  This is because the image retains its central position in the camera’s  gate.    And  just about every lens made for Regular 16mm will work with Ultra-16.   Not so with Super-16.   The camera’s  shutter also is more likely to cover  properly with Ultra.    Ultra-16  is less prone to edge-fogging  than Super-16 because it doesn’t extend to the edge.   Super-16 is bigger than Ultra,  but only slightly  so when cropped to  1.85 : 1 widescreen.   Just 3%  more,  meaning that  the quality difference is negligible.    Therefore U16 is virtually as good as Super-16 if 35mm blow-up is intended for cinema.  

Ultra-16  has a lot going for it.   What about the cons ?  Well,  it is a relatively new format and not many labs will do telecine work on it at present (but this could change as more people adopt U16.)   And because the image goes under and above the perforations,  great care must be taken to prevent scratches in the camera.   Having said this,  the modification is relatively simple and will work with  many 16mm cameras,  including 1930s  antiques !  

I recently carried out a U16 mod  on a fairly elderly Bolex H16RX  and I was pleased how straightforward it was.  The results were successful.    Here are my first U16 test- frames.   I’m pleased with the extra coverage opened up for wide angle lenses.  But as you can probably see from this test,  the code number is trying its best to disrupt the image on one of the frames.   I guess I went a bit too wide with the file,  but this area will be masked by the projector or printer.   Above you can see the new shape of the camera’s  gate.  I can’t show you the other side as you can see there’s  presently a film in the camera.    I should have really photographed the various stages of the job for anyone else interested in having a go.  That’ll  have to wait until my next Bolex U16 mod planned for later this year.   Right now I’ve begun working on a projector conversion….  watch this space and I’ll relate my experiences as they occur.  Wish me luck !

2 Responses to Is Ultra-16 the Answer ?

  1. Great article! Can’t wait to try U16.

  2. hey!
    great blog! I have been looking around for guides to convert my Bolex RX4 to U16. I don’t really have the money to pay someone else to do it, but I’ve heard of a lot of people doing the conversion themselves, including you, so I guess, with enough courage, I will try it myself, as well. I would be so grateful for some text about the various stages, photographs would be excellent, but even a written step-by-step would be highly appreciated.
    well, keep up the good work!
    Thanks,
    Anders Næss

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>